The humans can detect phenomena either the-world, or in the-world, compatibly with the empirical constraint. Every emp sample in the-world (matter) and in the-world (antimatter)-complex conjugate of each other-releases a "rubber band" of miniphotons and anti-miniphotons, captured by emp samples (in the-world miniphotons are captured in the-world anti-miniphotons). Matter and antimatter-in the-and-world, respectively-move with regular and with reversed time arrow, and eventually annihilate into "upgraded" emp, returning inside the-world. Materialization is endemic inside the-world.
Occasionally, some emp in the-world materializes into particle/antiparticle, composed of "degraded" emp that moves at a speed less than the speed of light. Phenomena occur inside a timeless-world, where no speed is defined. A photon is composed of miniphotons (of positive parity) and anti-miniphotons (of negative parity). Electromagnetic and gravitational interactions are explained by one discrete "carrier" (Feynman graph), without Newton's principles. We abandon forces and potentials, which have a "statistical" meaning. A previous paper deals with the general perspective, the present paper with axioms, subsequent papers with equations. We propose an axiomatic formulation of physics by avoiding paradoxes, by the "simplest" possible axioms.
He shows that popularizers use literary techniques and rhetorical strategies to construct and explain science, to represent the universe and humankind’s place in the universe, and to evoke aesthetic and emotional responses in their readers. In this dissertation, Daniel Helsing analyzes the construction of the universe, science, and human kind in contemporary mainstream AngloAmerican popularizations of physics and astronomy. It is de ned in dictionaries and mission statements by scienti c organizations, in education guidelines and high school curricula, in media coverage and science ction novels, and in popular science books. Yet while “science” is a contested term over which no one can claim de nitional authority, science is de ned and carried out in practice around the world daily. The use of “science” carries weight and credibility in society, at least in many sectors. No single institution, individual, or group of individuals can claim de nitional authority over its meaning. “Science” is a historically variable, connotationally rich, and contested term.
0 kommentar(er)
